First is Not Always Best
| Word Count: 1,586 Estimated Read Time: 6 Min. |
There is tremendous pressure when an individual has a new idea or a company has an innovative product and wants to be the first to market. The rush to launch is intense. But is that always a good thing? Some would say “yes” and others “no.” Rather than argue one side or the other, let’s consider some real-world examples to see the benefits and drawbacks of being first-mover vs. second-mover.
First case in point: Netflix. In 1997, Netflix was a fledgling online startup offering mail-order DVD rental through their online store and had $2 Million in seed capital. Today, it is a $150 Billion Dollar entertainment creation and streaming company. Netflix co-founder Marc Randolph — who came up with the idea of a mail-order DVD rentals (back when DVDs were brand new and before streaming was even a possibility) — wanted to offer customers a way to rent videos without the whopping late fees charged by brick-and-mortar stores. The 800-lb gorilla in the video-rental space was Blockbuster, which had built its entire business model on charging customers huge late fees which angered much of its customer base. And all video-rental brick-and-mortar stores had a finite number of VHS videos in inventory on any given day. Netflix saw a way to lure customers away by offering every film or program on DVD for sale or rent with zero late fees. Customers could view the titles (with a short description) online, order it and receive it by mail a couple of days later. Once viewed, they could put it in the return envelope and mail it back. This was a new concept. But, with new online startups popping up daily, there was great urgency to get to market first and fast.
Continue reading




